remo

Jun 012016
 

KSM . Motion to Recuse Military Judge (Army Colonel James Pohl) and the Current Prosecution Team and for Further Appropriate Relief. 10.May, 2016.


 

3. OVERVIEW.

“This motion arises from facts and events summarized below, and described in in more detail in references 1-6, Classified Attachment B.

In summary, the government sought permission from the Military Commission to dispose of certain evidence that had important guilt-phase and mitigation value. The defense filed an objection to the proposed disposal, and the Military Judge issued an order directing the government to ensure the evidence was not destroyed pending further order of this Commission.

As a result, counsel for Mr. Mohammad reasonably understood that timely notice would be provided if the Commission decided to alter or rescind the Order and permit the government to destroy the evidence. In direct reliance on the Commission’s assurances, Mr. Mohammad refrained from seeking further orders to maintain the status quo, to include a stay from the Commission, or interlocutory relief or writ of prohibition to prevent the destruction of the evidence.

Indeed, unless and until the Commission provided defense counsel further notice, and the defense were able to allege that the order barring destruction been withdrawn or substantively revised, initiating litigation of an appeal or a writ of prohibition would have been premature as a matter of law.

Meanwhile, during the period that the controlling order remained in effect publicly, the government communicated ex parte and in camera with the Military Judge seeking authorization to destroy the evidence; the Military Judge, in an ex parte, sealed and classified order, which the defense was not permitted to read, GRANTED the government’s request; and the government hereafter destroyed the evidence – all without giving fully-cleared defense counsel for Mr. Mohammad even a hint as to the changes until more than 18 months after the Commission’s issuance of the ex-parte destruction order, and waiting more than 20 months before disclosing to cleared defense counsel a partially-redacted though still classified version of the destruction order.” [emphasis added]

“The test for the appearance of partiality on the part of a judge so as to require recusal is whether an objective, disinterested observer fully informed of the facts would entertain a significant doubt that justice was done. The question to be asked is: Would a hypothetical onlooker be trouble by what happened?”[pp 12 below]


Would the hypothetical onlooker, knowing a judge had secretly – in collusion with government prosecution, allowed destruction of evidence helpful to the the defence […. evidence damaging to the prosecution….’] while pretending to the defense the evidence was protected from destruction, for 18 months;  Would a ‘hypothetical onlooker’ be deeply troubled by that?

‘Being troubled’ would depend on whether I am awake or asleep.  Upon whether Habeas Corpus and rule-of-Law means anything atall except something dead. It depends whether my reading includes/excludes all evidence gained since that terrible day holding the Official Commission Theory, a fabrication., a myth built around the magic-bolt myth-maker ZELIKOW, who closed off any evidence contrary to his original brief, as DULLES did 50 years before him. It depends whether I have read the Senate Select Committee Investigations into the black sites where it was categorical the ‘informations gained’ [KSM/waterboarded 183 times] were ‘impossible to assess [the effectiveness of the CIA’s enhanced interro[r]gation techniques] without violating “Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects” regarding human experimentation. (pp.13 of 19.SenateSelectCommittee on Intelligence) wherein the OCT cannot/would not/has not withstood even basic scrutiny since its publication – is a basic fantasy ; as this case clearly indicates…Evidence helpful to the defence has been officially destroyed. Not only that, but (pp7.) “The prosecution further informed the defense, and Military Judge, that the government never had any intention of disclosing the material, exculpatory evidence to the defense, and in the future it will not disclose similar evidence to the defense, irrespective of the sanctions that the Military Commission might impose for the government’s willful behaviour.” This from the land of the free and home of the brave, where mercenary psychologists with no practical interro(r)gation skills, [Jensen and Mitchell,] can make millions of dollars as privateers torturing out the 911 narrative.

Habeas Corpus RIP.


 

 

 

 


 

MEANWHILE On the other side of the Atlantic, in identical vein, an identical twin :

JIT: “there will be no public release of a final report on MH17 “

 Posted by at 11:56 pm
Jan 152016
 

http://www.incontrovertible911evidence.co.uk/

INCONTROVERTIBLE is the first and only feature length documentary we have which portrays the frank and candid views of Police Officers, Firefighters and Soldiers as they express their grave concerns about the official explanation for the events of 9/11. The film is intended to act as a practical aid in combating the mainstream media’s propaganda and outright lies concerning the attacks on September 11th 2001.

This film is intended to be viewed by Police Officers, Firefighters and all those serving in the Armed Forces as they are the among the best placed members of our society to have the ability to change things for the better. If you have friends or family who are serving then please pass this film onto them.

To watch film click here

 Posted by at 7:52 am
Jun 072015
 

Saudis ‘financed 9/11 US attacks’

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/september-11-attacks/11653706/US-report-claiming-Saudi-Arabia-financed-911-attack-redacted-by-Bush.html

This stunning world news headline featured in the Taranaki Daily News Sat June 6th as a full page color image of the 911 insider attack underway in New York.

On page B1, WORLD section,  FAIRFAX/TIMES reported from the United States, that  ‘Republican Congressman Thomas Massie (Kentucky) – after reading the chapter of 28 redacted pages in the 911 investigation papers  said : “I had to stop every couple of pages…..to rearrange my understanding of history. It challenges you to rethink everything.”

Which about sums up what this asks of the reader .

why were these papers not buried 12 years ago ?  What does it mean, to ‘out’ your ALLIES in the ‘war-against-terror’,  as being the very financiers’ OF it ?

The attacks had until now been blamed squarely on the twice reincarnated ‘alQaeda’ Osama BinLaden, who,  born of the House-of-Saudi, and a known asset of the CIA, had been dead for 13 years.

A member of the original investigation into the attacks, Senator Bob Graham, Florida[retired,] is calling for a public release of the 28 redacted pages.

why  now  ?  the ‘Deepstate’ tells us it controls the media – so why NOW would it identify Saudi Arabia as the financiers of the 911 terror attack ?

What does that do for the truth of 911,.  If you are allies with the financiers of it.

 

 

 

 

 

 Posted by at 6:31 am
May 172015
 

The American Institute of Architects confirmed their place in modern Amercian [sic] SCAD in Atlanta this week, by voting not to confront the massed evidence of Controlled Demolitions in New York on 911.

By allowing the Thermal Expansion hypothesis of Shyam Sunder to stand part [“The Results Are In || May 16, 2015 Overwhelming Majority of AIA Delegates Make the Political Decision and Vote Down Resolution 15-6:”], the Institute formally wrote into the literature its blessing of the 911 creatioNIST agnotology, whereby engineering algorithms were constructed -without peer review – to explain the 82 columned 47 storied steel framed high-rises’ sudden, complete and symmetric FREE FALL, directly into its own plan area, due to the NIST described ‘New Phenomenon’ “Sequential building collapse (due to Normal Office Furnishing Fires” already OUT at time of critical initiation) on ONE floor, around ONE column seat, in 6.5 seconds.

free fall.

‘“We are a professional – not a political – organization. But in this case, if we vote “no” on this resolution, we are making a political decision, not a professional one. Thank you very much.” – Daniel Barnum, FAIA

Those were the closing remarks from the lead sponsor of AIA Resolution 15-6, Daniel Barnum, FAIA. Seconds later, the AIA delegates cast their votes. The unfortunate outcome was that an overwhelming majority made the political decision. Resolution 15-6, which called upon the AIA to support a new WTC 7 investigation, was voted down 3,892 to 160, garnering 4% of the delegates’ votes.

The vote came after a number of impassioned statements from supporters and opponents. It was evident that those who opposed the resolution did not fully understand the official explanation of WTC 7’s destruction for which they claimed such adamant support. One architect from New York stated that diesel fuel fires were responsible for WTC 7’s destruction, an explanation that even NIST itself has disavowed.

Resolution 15-6 met the same fate as all but one of the substantive resolutions considered. Even in terms of percentages, the outcome was not that different, with the other four losing resolutions garnering between 6% and 26% of the votes and one being tabled. This does not mitigate our disappointment—nor does it excuse the delegates for their failure to accept their moral and ethical responsibility as architects—but it does illuminate something that we learned: it is difficult to pass even most slightly controversial resolution at the AIA National Convention.

However, that does not signal to us that we should give up on reaching out to the AIA membership. We are pleased to have gained the signatures of another 150 AIA members, seven of whom are fellows of the Institute. We will continue and intensify our outreach efforts with ever more creative and incisive strategies.

We would like to thank everyone who supported and contributed to our AIA resolution campaign. We were able to spark an unprecedented level of dialogue at the convention and gain a much deeper understanding of how we can successfully awaken the architecture community. Thank you.”‘ [A&E Bulletin]

 

 Posted by at 11:52 pm
Mar 282015
 
VIDEO: Résoudre le mystère du WTC7

By EV

Horsham, UK, 2013 – Tony Rooke, in an act of civil disobedience, refused to pay the mandatory £130 TV license fee claiming it violates Section 15 of the Terrorism Act. Rooke’s accusation was aimed at the BBC who reported the collapse of WTC 7 over 20 minutes before it actually fell, and the judge accepted Rooke’s argument. While it was not a public inquiry into 9/11, the recognition of the BBC’s actions on September 11th are considered a small victory, one that was never reported in the US.

Today was an historic day for the 9/11 truth movement,” Peter Drew of AE911Truth UK told Digital Journal, “with over 100 members of the public attending, including numerous journalists from around the UK as well as from across other parts of Europe.”

http://www.globalresearch.ca/bbc-foreknowledge-of-911-collapse-of-wtc7-british-man-won-law-suit-against-bbc-for-911-cover-up/5438161

 Posted by at 2:00 am
Mar 272015
 

By Craig McKeeAIA Atlanta

Sometimes it really pays to be persistent.

That’s what Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth found out this week when the organization achieved something truly remarkable. It succeeded in getting a commitment from the largest association of architects in the U.S. to debate and vote on a resolution supporting an investigation into the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 on Sept. 11, 2001.

The vote will take place at the annual convention of the American Institute of Architects, May 14-16, in Atlanta, GA. (If you’re not sure how much of a big deal this convention is, the keynote speaker is former president Bill Clinton.)

After several failed attempts to get the AIA to even consider looking into Building 7, AE tried a different approach in early 2015. Instead of simply appealing to the AIA leadership, they used the organization’s own rules to create a resolution that, pending approval by the AIA resolution committee, would come to the floor of the convention where it would be debated and voted on by delegates.

 

https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/03/26/aia-green-lights-building-7-vote/#comment-30992

 Posted by at 6:45 am
Jan 082015
 

http://vimeo.com/111784223

 

Now that we KNOW the top 15 stories of One World Trade can drive itself thru the stable 90 stories below it at accelerating speeds approaching Free Fall due to the natural consequence of gravity

[etc]

this should be easy.

DROP a 12 pound ball   ;  straight down free fall   :   14 feet   – – – onto a sheet of Glass 12ml/quarter inch thick glass approx700x400mm ; placed flat at the top of a stack of glass sheets 20 high  @  3″ apart.

A 12lb ball , straight down

Free Fall.

How many sheets of glass will break ?

 

 

[On 911,  the ball broke ’em all.]

 Posted by at 5:32 am
Jan 042015
 

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/03/world/americas/argentina-to-extradite-kurt-sonnenfeld-9-11-truther-on-murder-charge.html…

INTENDENTE ALVEAR, Argentina — An American who sought refuge in Argentina after he was accused of killing his wife in 2002 should be sent back to the United States, Argentina’s Supreme Court announced this week.
The decision to extradite the American, Kurt Sonnenfeld, who moved to Argentina in 2003 after prosecutors in Denver charged him with first-degree murder, ends a long dispute between the United States Justice Department and local courts in Argentina.

Mr. Sonnenfeld, who has claimed that he has proof that the American government had prior knowledge of the Sept. 11 attacks, and who has gained a following among like-minded conspiracy theorists, has said the government and prosecutors colluded to frame him for his wife’s death in order to silence him. The Denver district attorney’s office has denied these allegations.

Argentina’s courts had rejected extradition requests from the Justice Department, saying the district attorney’s office could not guarantee Mr. Sonnenfeld would be spared the death penalty in Colorado if convicted. But in a new ruling, the Argentine Supreme Court said it now had the assurances it needed to approve the extradition of Mr. Sonnenfeld.
However, one of the judges added, it was granting the extradition request on the condition that if Mr. Sonnenfeld were found guilty and sentenced to life in prison, there would be a provision for his parole. The judges said a sentence without the possibility of parole would violate Argentina’s Constitution.
Mr. Sonnenfeld, who is reported to be in his 50s, has requested political asylum in Argentina. He arrived in Buenos Aires a little more than a year after his wife was found by the police, slumped on a sofa in a bedroom at their Denver home on Jan. 1, 2002. She had been shot through the head. Mr. Sonnenfeld, who remarried in Argentina, has said his wife committed suicide.

Prosecutors dropped initial murder charges against him in mid-2002 because of insufficient evidence. New charges were later filed, and Mr. Sonnenfeld was arrested in Argentina and briefly jailed.
He had been a cameraman for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, sent to the World Trade Center shortly after the attacks of 2001 to document the aftermath. He said the video footage he collected indicated that the government had known about the attacks ahead of time.

Mr. Sonnenfeld accused the government of hacking into his email and tapping his telephone calls. He has appeared in the news media in Argentina and written a book, published in Spanish, called “El Perseguido” (“The Persecuted”).

JAN. 2, 2015 Jonathan Gilbert.

 Posted by at 8:21 pm
Jan 032015
 

A Libyan man accused of helping plan al Qaeda bombings of US embassies in Africa in the late 1990s has died of liver cancer in New York only days before his trial was due to begin.

Abu Anas al-Libi and a co-defendant had pleaded not guilty to the criminal charges stemming from the attacks in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 that killed 224 people and injured 5,000.

US legal authorities say the 50-year-old died in hospital after being taken from a detention centre.

Manhattan US Attorney Preet Bharara said in a letter to US District Judge Lewis Kaplan that Liby suffered “sudden complications arising out of his long-standing medical problems” and died on January 2. Prosecutors said Liby’s lawyer was with him throughout the day and an imam was present at the hospital.

Al-Libi’s son accused the US authorities of sending his father back to prison prematurely after an operation when his condition was not stable.

“We hold the US legally responsible for the death of my father,” he said.

In what the Libyan government criticised as an unauthorised incursion, Al-Libi was seized by US commandos in Tripoli in 2013 and taken to an American navy ship before eventually being flown to the States.

One of the FBI’s most wanted men, he had allegedly carried out surveillance missions of the US embassy in Nairobi over several years.

Copyright © 2015 euronews

 Posted by at 11:35 pm