http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/07/cate-jenkins-epa-ground-zero-dust?newsfeed=true

A government scientist sacked for exposing the dangers to firefighters from the caustic air at Ground Zero in the days after 9/11 got her job back on Monday.

A federal court ordered that Cate Jenkins, a chemist at the Environmental Protection Agency, be reinstated to her job with back pay.

Her lawyer said the decision, although based on matters of legal process, amounted to vindication for Jenkins’s claims that the EPA had covered up the danger posed to first responders and others in lower Manhattan from the asbestos and highly corrosive dust that rose from the wreckage of the World Trade Center.

It was also a rare victory for whistleblowers, said lawyer Paula Dinerstein. “This doesn’t happen that often.”

Jenkins, who has spent more than 30 years at the EPA, was the first agency official to warn of the dangers of the caustic dust rising from the ruins of the World Trade Center.

The dust, which had dangerously high pH levels, was so corrosive it caused chemical burns to the lungs of firefighters and other rescue teams. Hundreds of workers spent weeks at the scene without protective gear such as respirators.

Subsequent research has shown as many as two-thirds suffered permanent lung damage.

Medical experts now believe much of the health effects could have been prevented if workers were issued proper safety gear.

At the time, however, Christine Todd Whitman, then head of the EPA, claimed there were no readings to indicate a health hazard. Whitman has since said the Bush administration did not want to cause panic

Read article here

Silverstein laughs all the way to the bank

by Kevin Barrett

In today’s news, American Home Assurance has announced that it is capping payouts for WTC-demolition asbestos claims at a measly $10 million.

The announcement underlines just how much cheaper it is to demolish asbestos-laden skyscrapers without a permit, than to follow legal procedures.

Larry Silverstein, a reputed illicit-sex-industry mobster, purchased the World Trade Center in 2001, shortly after the New York Port Authority lost an asbestos lawsuit and was ordered to remove all asbestos from the Twin Towers. Cost estimates for that asbestos removal ranged from the low billions to the tens of billions – far more than the outdated, half-empty buildings were worth. (The City of New York had been desperately seeking a way to demolish the Towers since around 1990, but was prevented from doing so by asbestos issues.)
Read full article here

Richard Gage, AIA founder and chief spokesperson of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is currently speaking on a tour of 12 Canadian cities.

This week his talks included a presentation to Prof. Anthony Hall’s Globalization Studies students at the University of Lethbridge.

Gage’s Canadian tour is timed to coincide with a petition, signed so far by 1400 Canadian citizens. It will be read into the record of the Canadian parliament by a principled parliamentarian who questions the veracity of the cover story fed to the world within hours of the 9/11 debacle.

Richard Gage demonstrated to students that, for the the official cover story to be true, many basic laws of physics and engineering would have had to be be suspended. As Gage proceeded to debunk numerous state-sponsored myths about 9/11 it became apparent to many in the audience that 9/11 could only have been a false-flag psychological operation orchestrated to provide a pretext for imperialist wars of aggression.

In particular, Gage drew attention to the collapse of World Trade Center 7 which fell symmetrically into its own footprint at 5:20pm without having been struck by an airplane. Many see the obvious controlled demolition of WTC 7 as the smoking gun of 9/11, as the most clear demonstration that the world has been subjected to a monstrous lie that purposely misrepresents the most important geopolitical event so far in the twenty-first century.

Why is that so many Western academics and scholarly institutions fail to incorporate the widely available 9/11 evidence as part of their pedgagogy and scholarship?

Kevin Ryan 17 February 2012

Three years ago, an international team of scientists published a scientific paper that established the presence of thermitic residues in the dust from the World Trade Center (WTC) catastrophe.[1] Although the paper was only the last in a mutually-supportive evidentiary chain, it gave more hard evidence that energetic materials were used to destroy the WTC buildings. This conclusion was in agreement with the other scientific articles that had been previously published, and was also in agreement with eyewitness accounts and photographic evidence.

Read article here

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/evidence-mounting-9-11-first-responde…

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Published: Tuesday, February 21, 2012, 4:00 AM
WARGA, CRAIG/NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Joseph Zadroga fought for the bill that bears his son’s name. But will it cover first responders who fell ill with cancer?

The director of Mount Sinai Medical Center’s World Trade Center health program is preparing to publish a study that will show elevated risks of cancer among 9/11 rescue and recovery workers.

A leading authority on the illnesses suffered by Ground Zero responders, Dr. Philip Landrigan says that an analysis of 20,000 medical case histories revealed an incidence of cancer that is 14% higher than expected for a population of the same profile. The most common elevations were in prostate, thyroid and blood cancers.

Landrigan’s findings add to the evidence that the toll from service on or around The Pile, bad as that toll has been, will significantly worsen with time. Research by fire department doctors previously had found a 19% higher cancer rate among FDNY members who’d been at Ground Zero than among those who hadn’t.

It has been well-established that exposure to airborne toxins in the smoke and dust that shrouded Ground Zero produced respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal damage. And medical experts have feared from the start that cancers, which develop slowly, would emerge.

Read full article here

http://911blogger.com/news/2012-02-17/pivotal-911-petition-storms-canadian-parliament

Written by Wayne Coste
Feb 17th, 2012

Formal Appeal for Real WTC Investigation to be Accompanied by AE911Truth Tour of Canada

An unprecedented and potentially powerful Canadian initiative is entering a new phase that brings Canada one step closer to re-investigating the events at the World Trade Center on 9/11.

For the first time, the Canadian Parliament will respond, in at least some measure, to the calls for justice and accountability regarding the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7

Read article here

http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/bridgenorthcastle-or-why-two-planes-cannot-collapse-three-steel-framed-high-rises/

This is Bridgenorth Castle.

Bridgenorth castle was built by a very unsavoury character who took pleasure in gouging children’s eyes out with his fingers and killing people by starvation and torture and other general unpleasantness but I digress.

What, you ask, does Bridgeworth castle as suggested in the title of this post have to do with the collapse of the three WTC buildings on 911?

Let’s start with the size of the building. In order to get a sense of the size of the building (about 70 feet) I would like to draw your attention to the reverse triangle at the top of the wall. It is a rather thin line but that is the double roof which once topped the tower.

The tower was not the keep but a guard house and if you look at the right side of the building you see a narrow line from top to bottom which once held the iron portcullis. The row of holes in the wall from left to right held the beams from the floor and the total floors were approximately three. For more information here is the link to the time team doco on the building. Read more here

Rt.com
7 February 2012
The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center took the lives of 23 NYPD officers who responded to the scene that day.

In the decade since though, the number of cops that have died from cancer is more than double that number, and the link, experts say, is astounding.

Read article here

by André Rousseau
January 20, 2012
911truth.org
[Updated 1/21/12 to correct figures 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b and 2c, originally uploaded without study author's notations.]

INTRODUCTION

When major shocks occur at the Earth’s surface or at depth, waves of different types, magnitudes and speeds may move out from the source location. Such waves can be detected by seismometers located at recording stations, and the data from the recordings can be analyzed to learn many details of the source events. Seismic signals were recorded at stations in New York and four neighboring states on September 11, 2001 during the period when the North and South Towers (WTC1 and WTC2, respectively) were struck by airliners and collapsed, as well as during the collapse of Building 7 of the WTC, which had not been hit by a plane.

Data from the Palisades, NY recording station, located 34 km north-north-east of Manhattan, published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), provide the most detailed seismic waveforms for analysis, particularly for the determination of the locations (aerial, surface, or subsurface) and timing of the events that created the seismic waves.

Seismologists have been puzzled in their analysis of signals recorded for the events at the World Trade Center, as the contradictions are significant. They are particularly intrigued by the presence of seismic “peaks” before the collapses. This text focuses on the study of the seismic signals from Palisades. The new interpretation presented here renders the assertions of the seismic analysis of the events at the WTC, presented by the government, null and void.

Read article here

© 2011 New Zealand 911 Truth Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha