http://911blogger.com/news/2012-02-17/pivotal-911-petition-storms-canadian-parliament

Written by Wayne Coste
Feb 17th, 2012

Formal Appeal for Real WTC Investigation to be Accompanied by AE911Truth Tour of Canada

An unprecedented and potentially powerful Canadian initiative is entering a new phase that brings Canada one step closer to re-investigating the events at the World Trade Center on 9/11.

For the first time, the Canadian Parliament will respond, in at least some measure, to the calls for justice and accountability regarding the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7

Read article here

http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/bridgenorthcastle-or-why-two-planes-cannot-collapse-three-steel-framed-high-rises/

This is Bridgenorth Castle.

Bridgenorth castle was built by a very unsavoury character who took pleasure in gouging children’s eyes out with his fingers and killing people by starvation and torture and other general unpleasantness but I digress.

What, you ask, does Bridgeworth castle as suggested in the title of this post have to do with the collapse of the three WTC buildings on 911?

Let’s start with the size of the building. In order to get a sense of the size of the building (about 70 feet) I would like to draw your attention to the reverse triangle at the top of the wall. It is a rather thin line but that is the double roof which once topped the tower.

The tower was not the keep but a guard house and if you look at the right side of the building you see a narrow line from top to bottom which once held the iron portcullis. The row of holes in the wall from left to right held the beams from the floor and the total floors were approximately three. For more information here is the link to the time team doco on the building. Read more here

Rt.com
7 February 2012
The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center took the lives of 23 NYPD officers who responded to the scene that day.

In the decade since though, the number of cops that have died from cancer is more than double that number, and the link, experts say, is astounding.

Read article here

by André Rousseau
January 20, 2012
911truth.org
[Updated 1/21/12 to correct figures 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b and 2c, originally uploaded without study author's notations.]

INTRODUCTION

When major shocks occur at the Earth’s surface or at depth, waves of different types, magnitudes and speeds may move out from the source location. Such waves can be detected by seismometers located at recording stations, and the data from the recordings can be analyzed to learn many details of the source events. Seismic signals were recorded at stations in New York and four neighboring states on September 11, 2001 during the period when the North and South Towers (WTC1 and WTC2, respectively) were struck by airliners and collapsed, as well as during the collapse of Building 7 of the WTC, which had not been hit by a plane.

Data from the Palisades, NY recording station, located 34 km north-north-east of Manhattan, published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), provide the most detailed seismic waveforms for analysis, particularly for the determination of the locations (aerial, surface, or subsurface) and timing of the events that created the seismic waves.

Seismologists have been puzzled in their analysis of signals recorded for the events at the World Trade Center, as the contradictions are significant. They are particularly intrigued by the presence of seismic “peaks” before the collapses. This text focuses on the study of the seismic signals from Palisades. The new interpretation presented here renders the assertions of the seismic analysis of the events at the WTC, presented by the government, null and void.

Read article here


WTC Bone Fragments Still Surface a Decade After 9/11

Written by AE911Truth Staff

Wednesday, 11 January 2012 20:16

A recent New York Times article revealed that a decade after 9/11, small fragments of human remains from victims from the World Trade Center towers are still being identified. This adds to the documented evidence of the severe destruction of the bodies of WTC victims, a phenomenon that could only have been caused by explosives. Read article here

Written by Jeremy R. Hammond, Foreign Policy Journal

Wednesday, 07 December 2011 15:20

by Jeremy R. Hammond, Foreign Policy Journal, 11/16/11

Editor’s note: Journalist Chris Mohr, an ardent defender of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, recently wrote an article for Skeptic Magazine in which he attempted to rebut several key pieces of evidence that prove the WTC skyscrapers were brought down by controlled demolition. Researcher Jeremy R. Hammond exposes the fallacies in Mohr’s arguments in this response published in the Foreign Policy Journal.

Chris Mohr at Skeptic magazine writes that “conspiracists are working hard to publicize their claims of scientific validity to the conjecture that the World Trade Center buildings were destroyed through controlled demolition.” He mentions a debate he had with Richard Gage, the founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, where more than 1,500 professional architects and engineers who question the official explanation for the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings have signed a petition calling for a new—that is to say, a real—investigation

Read article here

http://911blogger.com/news/2011-11-27/janette-mackinlay-speaks-uc-davis-may-1-2009

Janette Mackinlay, 1948 – 2010 was an artist, 9/11 survivor and activist for 9/11 Truth and justice. This video (in 2 parts) shows Janette’s presentation at the University of California Davis on May 1, 2009.

The occasion was Prof. Steven E. Jones’ first public presentation of his research on dust from the World Trade Center. Janette was the first person to give Prof. Jones a sample of dust from the World Trade Center. Prof. Jones, Prof. Niels Harrit and other scientists found red gray chips in the dust, some visible to the naked eye. Scientific examination revealed that these were unexploded pieces of nanothermite, a military grade explosive researched and developed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories in Livermore, California.

The question of how nanothermite came to be in the World Trade Center dust has never been answered by the government or the media. On top of all the other eyewitness, physical and photographic evidence already available, this left the official story of 9/11 – the 19 Arabs conspiracy theory – without any credibility.

Read article here

http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/towers-of-dust/

In a conventional demolition the intent is maximum destruction with minimum pollution of the environment. This means that all asbestos, gypsum, heavy metals and other pollutants are removed before the demolition. The average pile remaining is about 12 % of the original height. Here is what happened to the twin towers on 911:

beavis and butthead small

4409
You Tube
November 7, 2011

Beavis and Butt-head discover Infowars.com and find out 9/11 was an inside job.

© 2011 New Zealand 911 Truth Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha