http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/bridgenorthcastle-or-why-two-planes-cannot-collapse-three-steel-framed-high-rises/

This is Bridgenorth Castle.

Bridgenorth castle was built by a very unsavoury character who took pleasure in gouging children’s eyes out with his fingers and killing people by starvation and torture and other general unpleasantness but I digress.

What, you ask, does Bridgeworth castle as suggested in the title of this post have to do with the collapse of the three WTC buildings on 911?

Let’s start with the size of the building. In order to get a sense of the size of the building (about 70 feet) I would like to draw your attention to the reverse triangle at the top of the wall. It is a rather thin line but that is the double roof which once topped the tower.

The tower was not the keep but a guard house and if you look at the right side of the building you see a narrow line from top to bottom which once held the iron portcullis. The row of holes in the wall from left to right held the beams from the floor and the total floors were approximately three. For more information here is the link to the time team doco on the building. Read more here

Written by Jeremy R. Hammond, Foreign Policy Journal

Wednesday, 07 December 2011 15:20

by Jeremy R. Hammond, Foreign Policy Journal, 11/16/11

Editor’s note: Journalist Chris Mohr, an ardent defender of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, recently wrote an article for Skeptic Magazine in which he attempted to rebut several key pieces of evidence that prove the WTC skyscrapers were brought down by controlled demolition. Researcher Jeremy R. Hammond exposes the fallacies in Mohr’s arguments in this response published in the Foreign Policy Journal.

Chris Mohr at Skeptic magazine writes that “conspiracists are working hard to publicize their claims of scientific validity to the conjecture that the World Trade Center buildings were destroyed through controlled demolition.” He mentions a debate he had with Richard Gage, the founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, where more than 1,500 professional architects and engineers who question the official explanation for the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings have signed a petition calling for a new—that is to say, a real—investigation

Read article here

http://911blogger.com/news/2011-11-27/janette-mackinlay-speaks-uc-davis-may-1-2009

Janette Mackinlay, 1948 – 2010 was an artist, 9/11 survivor and activist for 9/11 Truth and justice. This video (in 2 parts) shows Janette’s presentation at the University of California Davis on May 1, 2009.

The occasion was Prof. Steven E. Jones’ first public presentation of his research on dust from the World Trade Center. Janette was the first person to give Prof. Jones a sample of dust from the World Trade Center. Prof. Jones, Prof. Niels Harrit and other scientists found red gray chips in the dust, some visible to the naked eye. Scientific examination revealed that these were unexploded pieces of nanothermite, a military grade explosive researched and developed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories in Livermore, California.

The question of how nanothermite came to be in the World Trade Center dust has never been answered by the government or the media. On top of all the other eyewitness, physical and photographic evidence already available, this left the official story of 9/11 – the 19 Arabs conspiracy theory – without any credibility.

Read article here

Why can’t the experts get their stories straight?

From Elizabeth Woodward
Consensus911.org

The full unedited BBC interview, conducted by Mike Rudin, of Dr. Niels Harrit, Prof. Emeritus of the University of Copenhagen, recorded in his own home — this being the full videotape as recorded by Dr. Harrit himself.

“May 2011 BBC Interview with Dr. Niels Harrit”

Dr. Harrit’s full videotape may be compared with the BBC Production that was released in early September, 2011.

The BBC Conspiracy Files Production, “9/11: Ten Years On”, is described here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0148yz5

and it may be seen in segments on YouTube here:

10/9/2011

Souce:
aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/breaking-high-explosive-residue-found-in-the-lung-tissue-of-911-first-responder/

Breaking: High explosive residue has been found in the lung tissue of 911 first responders.

Because it had to be been determined whether 911 first responders who died in the aftermath of 911 died of diseases caused by the dust they inhaled and swallowed on 911 and the days after their bodies had to be autopsied.

It has just been announced at the Toronto hearings that their lungs contained high explosive residue. This connects the dust of the buildings to the explosive particles found in the dust collected by New Yorkers on that day as analysed by the team lead by prof. Nils Harrit of the Danish University of Copenhagen. Prof. Harrit is a scientist specialised in Nano technology.

May I remind you that these living testimonies to the atrocities in New York are no allowed to attend the commemorations in New York.

ae911truth.org

http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/552-toronto-hearings.html#continue

23 August 2011
Written by Mike Bondi, PEng

To capitalize on the strategic importance of the 10th anniversary of 9/11, the International Center for 9/11 Studies is sponsoring a four-day set of hearings, September 8-11, at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada. Officially called “The International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001”, this historic gathering of panelists, expert witnesses, and numerous key figures in the 9/11 truth movement is being more commonly referred to as the “Toronto Hearings.” Focusing primarily on the scientific forensic and other evidence and eyewitness testimony, with emphasis on the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises, the Hearings will identify some of the best evidence regarding the events of 9/11, thus encouraging and enabling national and/or international legal agencies to pursue formal investigations.

Planning for the Hearings is currently underway and being coordinated by a Steering Committee, an Advisory Committee and several Working Groups. The Steering Committee is comprised of James Gourley, Laurie Manwell, Graeme MacQueen, Kevin Ryan and Adnan Zuberi. The Hearings will be moderated by Michael Keefer, Professor of English at the University of Guelph, and Matthew Witt, Associate Professor of Public Administration at the University of LaVerne.


Read rest of article here

ae911truth.org 

20 August 2011

© 2011 New Zealand 911 Truth Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha