WTC Bone Fragments Still Surface a Decade After 9/11
Written by AE911Truth Staff
Wednesday, 11 January 2012 20:16
A recent New York Times article revealed that a decade after 9/11, small fragments of human remains from victims from the World Trade Center towers are still being identified. This adds to the documented evidence of the severe destruction of the bodies of WTC victims, a phenomenon that could only have been caused by explosives. Read article here
Written by Jeremy R. Hammond, Foreign Policy Journal
Wednesday, 07 December 2011 15:20
by Jeremy R. Hammond, Foreign Policy Journal, 11/16/11
Editor’s note: Journalist Chris Mohr, an ardent defender of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, recently wrote an article for Skeptic Magazine in which he attempted to rebut several key pieces of evidence that prove the WTC skyscrapers were brought down by controlled demolition. Researcher Jeremy R. Hammond exposes the fallacies in Mohr’s arguments in this response published in the Foreign Policy Journal.
Chris Mohr at Skeptic magazine writes that “conspiracists are working hard to publicize their claims of scientific validity to the conjecture that the World Trade Center buildings were destroyed through controlled demolition.” He mentions a debate he had with Richard Gage, the founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, where more than 1,500 professional architects and engineers who question the official explanation for the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings have signed a petition calling for a new—that is to say, a real—investigation
Read article here
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-11-27/janette-mackinlay-speaks-uc-davis-may-1-2009
Janette Mackinlay, 1948 – 2010 was an artist, 9/11 survivor and activist for 9/11 Truth and justice. This video (in 2 parts) shows Janette’s presentation at the University of California Davis on May 1, 2009.
The occasion was Prof. Steven E. Jones’ first public presentation of his research on dust from the World Trade Center. Janette was the first person to give Prof. Jones a sample of dust from the World Trade Center. Prof. Jones, Prof. Niels Harrit and other scientists found red gray chips in the dust, some visible to the naked eye. Scientific examination revealed that these were unexploded pieces of nanothermite, a military grade explosive researched and developed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories in Livermore, California.
The question of how nanothermite came to be in the World Trade Center dust has never been answered by the government or the media. On top of all the other eyewitness, physical and photographic evidence already available, this left the official story of 9/11 – the 19 Arabs conspiracy theory – without any credibility.
Read article here
http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/towers-of-dust/
In a conventional demolition the intent is maximum destruction with minimum pollution of the environment. This means that all asbestos, gypsum, heavy metals and other pollutants are removed before the demolition. The average pile remaining is about 12 % of the original height. Here is what happened to the twin towers on 911:
4409
You Tube
November 7, 2011
Beavis and Butt-head discover Infowars.com and find out 9/11 was an inside job.
Why can’t the experts get their stories straight?
From Elizabeth Woodward
Consensus911.org
The full unedited BBC interview, conducted by Mike Rudin, of Dr. Niels Harrit, Prof. Emeritus of the University of Copenhagen, recorded in his own home — this being the full videotape as recorded by Dr. Harrit himself.
“May 2011 BBC Interview with Dr. Niels Harrit”
Dr. Harrit’s full videotape may be compared with the BBC Production that was released in early September, 2011.
The BBC Conspiracy Files Production, “9/11: Ten Years On”, is described here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0148yz5
and it may be seen in segments on YouTube here:
Posted on September 23, 2011 by WashingtonsBlog
Anyone who paid any attention to the claims of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, the Gulf oil spill or the Fukushima nuclear accident knows that the government often twists science to promote certain policy objectives, such as drumming up support for the invasion of Iraq or becoming a booster for nuclear power and big oil (and thus downplaying the damage from nuclear accidents and oil spills).
President’s National Medal of Science winner Lynn Margulis notes that the scientific method is to follow the facts where they lead, to adopt the theory which has the most proof, and to discard theories which are contradicted by the facts.
Read article here