- See more at: http://xrepublic.tv/node/6452#sthash.7HipKd1a.dpuf
Following is an excerpt from an email from http://ReThink911.org :
Dear ReThink911 Supporters,
Video: ReThink911 at the Ottawa Transit Commission
I am delighted to inform you that our new campaign in Canada has already caused quite a stir in Ottawa, where it was officially announced at Wednesday’s Transit Commission meeting and then received positive coverage in Thursday’s Metro News. This exciting new video of the Transit Commission meeting provides a stunning glimpse of the impact our campaigns have had.
Plus: ReThink911 receives positive coverage from the Metro News
The New York Times won’t talk about the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7. Now it’s our job to expose them for not doing their job. Spread this video far and wide.
If you are near NYC, join us for the final day of leafleting outside the NY Times next Saturday, November 30 at 1pm. Come join the crowd and share in the activism and education.
Thank you for getting involved!
Support ReThink911 with a donation today
ReThink911 is sponsored by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, and Remember Building 7, a campaign by 9/11 family members to raise awareness of Building 7.
Donations are tax-deductible as allowed by codes and restrictions.
Unsubscribe or Change your email subscription preferences
9/11 Truth: The Mysterious Collapse of WTC Seven
Why NIST’s Final 9/11 Report is Unscientific and False
By David Ray Griffin
Global Research, September 06, 2013
Gobal Research 14 September 2009
[originally published in September 2009]
At 5:21 in the afternoon of 9/11, almost seven hours after the Twin Towers had come down, Building 7 of the World Trade Center also came down. The collapse of this building was from the beginning considered a mystery. 
The same should have been true, to be sure, of the collapse of the Twin Towers. But they had been hit by planes, which had ignited big fires in them, and many people assumed this combination of causes to be sufficient to explain why they came down.
But WTC 7 had not been hit by a plane, so it was apparently the first steel-framed high-rise building in the known universe to have collapsed because of fire alone. New York Times writer James Glanz quoted a structural engineer as saying: “[W]ithin the structural engineering community, [WTC 7] is considered to be much more important to understand [than the Twin Towers],” because engineers had no answer to the question, “why did 7 come down?” 
From a purely scientific perspective, of course, there would have been an obvious answer. Scientists, presupposing the regularity of nature, operate on the principle that like effects generally imply like causes. Scientists are, therefore, loathe to posit unprecedented causes for common phenomena. By 9/11, the collapse of steel-framed high-rises had become a rather common phenomenon, which most Americans had seen on television. And in every one of these cases, the building had been brought down by explosives in the process known as controlled demolition. From a scientific perspective, therefore, the obvious assumption would have been that WTC 7 came down because explosives had been used to remove its steel supports.
However, the public discussion of the destruction of the World Trade Center did not occur in a scientific context, but in a highly charged political context. America had just been attacked, it was almost universally believed, by foreign terrorists who had flown hijacked planes into the Twin Towers, and in response the Bush administration had launched a “war on terror.” The idea that even one of the buildings had been brought down by explosives would have implied that the attacks had not been a surprise, so this idea could not be entertained by many minds in private, let alone in public.
This meant that people had to believe, or at least pretend to believe, that Building 7 had been brought down by fire, even though, as Glanz wrote: “[E]xperts said no building like it, a modern, steel-reinforced high-rise, had ever collapsed because of an uncontrolled fire.”  And so, this building’s collapse had to be considered a mystery – insofar as it was considered at all.
But this was not much. Although WTC 7 was a 47-story building, which in most places would have been the tallest building in the city, if not the state, it was dwarfed by the 110-story Twin Towers. It was also dwarfed by them in the ensuing media coverage. And so, Glanz wrote, the collapse of Building 7 was “a mystery that . . . would probably have captured the attention of the city and the world,” if the Twin Towers had not also come down.  As it was, however, the mystery of Building 7’s collapse was seldom discussed.
Read full article http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-collapse-of-wtc-seven/15201
Why the NIST WTC Report on the Towers is False
by Kevin Ryan
This article first appeared at ReThink911.org.
The official account of the Twin Towers’ destruction was produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and released in September of 2005. Unfortunately, NIST’s report only provided a hypothesis of the events leading up to the initiation of the collapses, or the “collapse initiation sequence.” NIST did not attempt to explain how once the collapses initiated, the upper sections of these 110-story skyscrapers would continue falling downward through the path of greatest resistance, instead simply asserting that, once each building was destabilized, “global collapse ensued.” However, we can examine the general features of NIST’s collapse initiation sequence for both Twin Towers to see if it is consistent with known facts, or is at least self-consistent.
The seven steps of NIST’s collapse initiation sequence that are common to both Twin Towers are as follows:
1. A number of columns were severed by aircraft impact
2. Loads were redistributed to the remaining columns
3. Fireproofing was “widely dislodged”
4. Columns and floor assemblies were softened by high temperatures
5. Softened floor assemblies began to sag
6. Sagging floors pulled the exterior columns inward, causing columns to buckle
7. Instability spread around the exterior of the building
The first two steps of this sequence are not surprising. With regard to step one, we can accept that approximately 15% of the columns were severed in each building by aircraft impact. This is quite low compared to original design claims reported in the mid-1960s by the Engineering News-Record that said the towers could lose more than 25% of their columns without having any problems. As for the second step, NIST says the loads actually decreased on some columns and increased slightly for others. Again, there is no problem here considering similar design claims that the exterior columns could withstand 2,000% increases in live load.
Read full paper here
So many people talk about the 9/11 incident, but so few talk about one glaring problem…..why did WTC 7 collapse? This is an intriguing insight into the events of that tragic day. It asks questions no one wants to ask.
Dedicated to all the innocent people who lost their lives on that tragic day which sealed America’s fate for the worse. If you think that a handful of Arabs were able to coordinate these events, please, for your own sake, do more research, think a lot more, and have less denial.
Please feel free to comment and rate this video. However, cruel and/or vulgar comments will not be tolerated and will be promptly removed. Also proselytizing (which includes purely faith-based comments, as opposed to a true scientific argument), comments unrelated to the video posted, and comments all in capital letters (which is interpreted as yelling) will also not be tolerated and will be removed. Use proper English in proper sentences. Capital words can be used for emphasis. YouTube also has automatic spell check for use when posting. Please use it. Accounts who violate these terms run the risk of being blocked. If you don’t accept these terms, then go somewhere else.
All videos posted by Sage Igmund are intended for informational, educational, and scientific purposes, and are not for profit. Please enjoy!
September 11, 2001 delivered a late afternoon collapse of World Trade 7. Vince Dementri of CBS 2 New York was right next to the building with great footage of the damage around and to number 7. Also here is a view of the collapse when Vince was doing an interview. The building was expected to go down and it did. Any reasonable adult can see this building was taken down. A 4 block area was cordoned off by police and rescue efforts were suspended until the building was demolished. Another plume of Toxic dust went up to go along with the Twin Collapses earlier finishing the destruction of the entire complex. There was substantial damage to the building and not just a few office fires as some people insist on repeating. They took it down quickly and then the cleanup really began as that must have finished anyone that may have survived. A new Investigation is something everyone should be able to agree on. let’s do it.
Cynthia McKinney Supports ReThink911
Former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney Endorses ReThink911
JUNE 24, 2013
New York to Learn Once and For All a Third Tower Fell on 9/11
Make This Billboard a Reality in September
The ReThink911 campaign is pleased to announce that this September’s global ad campaign will be spearheaded by a 50-foot billboard in the heart of Times Square. Towering over the surrounding blocks, this billboard will attract the attention of nearly one million pedestrians each day and set the stage for New York and the whole world to learn that a large 47-story skyscraper also fell on 9/11.
ReThink911 has put down half the money needed to purchase this billboard for the full month of September. Now we are counting on you to bring us the rest of the way. Donate now, and we will send you a free ReThink911 bumper sticker with your donation of at least $50.*
Or, if you wish to donate to one of the other cities where ReThink911 is placing ads, click here to find your preferred city and donate generously. Together we can make ReThink911 go viral this September.
Re-strategizing the Campaign
As you will see on ReThink911.org, the campaign has decided to narrow the number of cities to eleven strategically selected markets due to the fact that a large source of pledged matching funds has not arrived as expected, and due to a revised strategy of concentrating our funds in fewer cities. Those eleven cities are:
New York City
The campaign has selected a specific ad buy for each city and is using the funds raised prior to the campaign to cover half of the cost of each buy. As with the billboard in Times Square, we are counting on you to bring us the rest of the way by August 1. Fortunately, our targets are well within reach!
With this revised strategy, ReThink911 will be investing strategically to generate the biggest return in terms of raising awareness, gaining media coverage, and significantly altering the public dialogue on 9/11.
Those who have donated for ads in other cities will be asked to decide what they want to do with their donation. We in the ReThink911 campaign understand that many supporters were excited about having ads in their city. However, we are certain this new strategy will be just as successful, if not more successful, with your continued commitment.
Following the fundraising drive, which ends on August 1, ReThink911 will start gearing up for a month of grassroots actions to take place in dozens of cities across the world during the month of September.
We thank you for your generous support, and we cannot wait to move forward in our collective goal of creating the ultimate breakthrough!
Support this campaign with a donation
Rethink911 is sponsored by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, and Remember Building 7, a campaign by 9/11 family members to raise awareness of Building 7.
All donations are 100% tax-deductible.