Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko was killed a car accident Saturday in the Netherlands. He was reportedly driving from church when he collided head-on with a tree. There was also a dog in the car who survived. Jowenko is best known in the 9/11 truth community for his analysis of Building 7, which he concluded was a professionally-engineered controlled demolition.
From: The International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001
To: All those concerned about the events of September 11, 2001
Four days of international hearings (September 8-11, 2011) will be held at Ryerson University in Toronto on the tenth anniversary of this pivotal event.
The events of September 11 have provided a pretext for a War on Terror that has replaced the Cold War as a global conflict framework within which military invasions and occupations have taken place.
The focus on military solutions to complex human problems has sidetracked humanity at the very moment when peaceful interaction is needed to address genuine challenges facing humanity.
Objectives of the Hearings:
(1) To present evidence that the U.S. government’s official investigation into the events of September 11, 2001 is seriously flawed and has failed to describe and account for the 9/11 events.
(2) To single out the most weighty evidence of the inadequacy of the U.S. government’s investigation; to organize, classify, preserve, and publicize that evidence;
(3) To submit a record and a summary of the Hearings, together with signed Statutory Declarations by witnesses, to relevant governments, groups and international agencies with the request that a full and impartial investigation be launched into the events of September 11, 2001
(4) To engage the attention of the public and media through witness testimony as well as through public talks and media events during the four day event.
Expert witnesses and scholars from the independent 9/11 research community will include:
David Chandler, mathematician; Jon Cole, engineer; Richard Gage, architect; former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel; 9/11 scholar Dr. David Ray Griffin; chemist Dr. Niels Harrit; physicist Dr. Steven Jones; Prof. Emeritus Dr. Graeme MacQueen, Peace Studies, McMaster University; PhD candidate Laurie Manwell; chemist Kevin Ryan; 9/11 scholar Dr. Peter Dale Scott, and political scientist Dr. Lance DeHaven-Smith.
The Hearings are not in themselves a new investigation, but rather a gathering and presentation of the evidence collected over the last 10 years showing that the government account is incorrect and that a new investigation is needed to fully explore the lines of evidence presented.
The Toronto Hearings are being sponsored by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, and will be moderated by Dr. Michael Keefer (Canada) and Dr. Matthew Witt (U.S.). The final report will be edited by attorney James Gourley.
The Steering Committee invites your support and participation in helping to publicize and finance this strategic mission.
The Committee will welcome any offers of resources or assistance in support of the Toronto Hearings, using the contact form at http://torontohearings.org/about
Yours sincerely,
James Gourley
Dr. Graeme MacQueen
Laurie Manwell
Kevin Ryan
Adnan Zuberi
On Wednesday 6th April 2011, in closed session, read to Select Committee on the 8th floor Parliament ‘Beehive’ buildings Wellington, the following statement concerning the relationship between New Zealand’s Security Intelligence requirements, the Bill, and use of the 911 War on Terror as mandate for expansion of powers.
It is offered for the record here, because the papers and reference work submitted were tabled, therefore are now on NZ Parliamentary record.
Hon Rodney Hide, Hon Phil Goff, Rt Hon John Key, Dr Russel Norman, Hon Tariana Turia
Submission on the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Amendment Bill
My name is Roger Morris. I am an artist , and I wish to speak toward power becoming more secretive, and its practitioners less accountable in a very dangerous world.
I note the advice of the Privacy Commissioner that review of security laws should take up to three years.
As far as I can judge, in according these POWERS to our State Security Service, we are relying on a trust that operational and Director behavior will prove honorable to the task, an honor historically proven susceptible to centralized power and external influence.[War Terror, Ahmed ZAOUI],
I recognize a violent world within which Intelligence allegiances, militarism and secrecy play an ever wider, ever more personally invasive role. Not necessarily protective of individual citizens rights involved in genuine advocacy.
A world dominated by the central narrative WAR on TERROR.
From which, in essence, the needs of this Bill derive.
A narrative now widely understood to be deceptive.[Weapons of Mass Destruction.]
Within this, New Zealand’s part becomes less its own and more one in alliance with a dominating world view. That world view encompasses reduction of Habeas Corpus rights on a global citizenship. Has mandated authority for itself to conduct illegal Wars, pre-emptive strikes, Occupation, Torture, Extraordinary Rendition and targeted assassination of suspects without trial.
This SIS Bill appears to streamline interoperability and compliance with outside agencies involved in the war on terror.
It appears to narrow power to the singular [Director], with no, or lesser, independent or Judicial review.
5AA[1] The Director may delegate powers to a specified class of employees of the service.
Where is that class specified?
It is conceivable other intelligence services could be delegated power under this specified class to act within NZ Jurisdiction, who could also, in turn, purport or have purport, another person entirely unknown to act within NZ Jurisdiction.
5AA[7] A person purporting to act under any delegation under this section is, in the absence of proof to the contrary, presumed to be acting in accordance with the terms of the delegation.
What if they are not?
Why would a person ‘purporting’ to act under delegation be presumed to be acting under delegation?
Of lesser concern, 5AAB[4] allows for a director to initiate delegation, but not necessarily notify the next director.
However, these are material questions probably easily answered.
My primary concern is, that by enacting the BILL – even though I can see it as proper with regard combatting genuine high crime – notwithstanding that, but with regard the War on TERROR, by signing, we as a nation show further acceptance of and compliance with another BEHAVIOR altogether.
It is THAT connection that disturbs me.
If we accept and participate in WAR based on false premise – actually known deceptions [WMD's. No fore-knowledge of 911];
a WAR declared illegal by the United Nations; a WAR that has killed and maimed and displaced millions of people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan; now rapidly SPREADING; if we use that impetus – the WAR on TERROR – to empower our own state security apparatus to strengthen ITs power to surveil its own population,
what does that say to the purpose of surveillance?
In the world of technology and high crime, as said, I have nothing against enabling Law agencies tools to fight criminality at these levels – legitimate concerns balanced -
But the WAR on TERROR is something ELSE. It is a Fear based Narrative constructed to facilitate Wars of Aggression and used to justify greater State Secrecy and powers of Surveillance/information gathering worldwide, and now here through this Bill.
It is also a fast Devolving Fabrication. One built upon the Greater Deception of 911 itself. Something our Parliament has not confronted in any perceivable manner, but,
as the growing Forensic and other evidence gathered in the past ten years clearly show,
one which HAS to be contended with by the Representatives of the people of New Zealand, if we are going to continue to use it as justification for expansion of security LAW .
For your reference,
I wish to place on record the following items to back my statements that the ‘War on Terror’ is known Fabrication , and the 911 Commission Report an unproven THEORY needing immediate International re- Investigation ≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈
1]
copy of a two year Forensic study of Dust samples from the 911 disaster.
[DOI: 10.2174/1874412500902010007]
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen Pp 7-31
This document, a peer reviewed science study, categorically shows EVIDENCE of explosive residue – complex Military Grade, Super-nanothermite Incendiary/explosive in the DUST of WTC Catastrophe.
2]
DVD copy of a public lecture by Mr Richard GAGE AIA to over 700 people at Te Papa, Nov. 2009, in which he presents the findings of 1400 registered Architects and Engineers world wide, who provide science/physics based evidence World Trade Center Towers one two and seven were destroyed by complex Explosive Controlled Demolition. That the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center complex is an unproven THEORY.
3]
copy of “Top Ten Connections between NIST and Nanothermite industry”
http://www.journalof911studies.com/index.html refer KEVIN RYAN
A reading list concerning “War on Terror” evidence of Whistleblowers to the fact that a] the 911 strike was actively reported to the Bush administration before 911 by U.S. Intelligence services[among others], and that the information was actively suppressed to facilitate the construct fraud ‘War on Terror’.
a. “Welcome to Terrorland” Mohamed Atta & the 9-11 Cover-up in Florida .2004; ISBN-10: 0970659164; ISBN-13: 978-0970659163 and
b. Behrooz Sarshar Testimony of FBI coverup of pre-911 attack warnings [Agent Frields: "It never Happened."]
c. Lt.Col Anthony Shaffer/Able Danger:
“We now learn that Atta was also connected to a top secret operation of the Pentagon’s Special Operations Command (SOCOM) in the US. According to Army reserve Lieutenant-Colonel Anthony Shaffer, a top secret Pentagon project code-named Able Danger had identified Atta and three other 9/11 hijackers as members of an al-Qaida cell more than a year before the attacks.” http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=867
d. Sibel Edmonds, FBI Translator/Whistleblower. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6063340745569143497#
And http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/
That “Weapons of Mass Destruction” were known by the Bush administration, through its intelligence and other agencies NOT to exist, but that that information was suppressed and the WMD lie was constructed to advance and conduct the Illegal Wars in Afghanistan and IRAQ. Now Pakistan Yemen and where else will be known in time.
Chapter 7, pp 89 ” It was not for lack of trying by those of us at mid-level, below the leadership. We raised the alarms. Alas, Republicans at the command level chose not to act.Instead, throughout the summer of 2001, the U.S. threatened Iraq with military retaliation “worse than anything they’d experienced before,” if a 9/11 style of attack occurred. Yes, U.S. intelligence abhorred the concept of a 9/11 attack, including my own handlers[Dr. Richard Fuisz, and Paul HOVEN]. But a handful of puppeteers controlling the stage at the highest levels of Government aggressively prepped some factions of U.S. intelligence to accept War with Iraq as the inevitable outcome of a 9/11 strike. In which case, they made no effort to block 9/11, so that they could fulfill their quest. It’s critical to understand that Intelligence is not a monolithic mega-entity but a community of factions, broken down into small teams. Once advance warnings about the World Trade Center enter into the equation, it becomes entirely conceivable that some different team within a competing faction, called an orphan, might have entered the world Trade Center in the midnight hours, and positioned explosives throughout the buildings, with the intention of maximizing the demolition impact whenever the hijacked airplanes struck the buildings.”
4. ‘Zelikow minders memo’ of active interference with 911 Commission interviews: http://911reports.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/newly-released-memo-government-%E2%80%98minders%E2%80%99-at-911-commission-interviews-%E2%80%98intimidated%E2%80%99-witnesses-kevin-fenton/
and: http://www.scribd.com/doc/13279605/911-Commission-Memo-Executive-Branch-Minders-Intimidation-of-Witnesses
5. The mysterious collapse of building 7. David Ray Griffin.ISBN 978-1-56656-786-2
6. the 911 Commission report. ISBN9780312450991
7. ’911 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions.’ David Ray Griffin. ISBN-10: 1566565847; ISBN-13: 978-1566565844
8. NIST reports http://wtc.nist.gov/ FEMA report http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/official/fema.html
9. Architects and Engineers pamphlet discussing physics similarities between WTC destruction and Controlled Demolition.
[paper copy attached] http://www.ae911truth.org/ 1,474 Registered Architects and Engineers calling for a new Independent with Supeona power Investigation into the destruction of WTC on 911.
10. David Chandler proof of free fall WTC building 7. Acknowledged by NIST.
http://www.youtube.com/user/davidchandler911 http://www.ae911truth.org/
Here are some interviews that feature Kiwi activists associated with nz911truth.org. (Note: these files will not currently stream, you just have to download them. Apologies for the poor audio on most of the Redbird interviews.)
NEW YORK CITY — The NYC Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN) is launching a television ad campaign on Election Day in New York City calling for an investigation into the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7, the third building to collapse on 9-11. Building 7 came down at 5:20 in the afternoon although it had not been hit by an aircraft.
The ad, which is entitled “BuildingWhat?” and can be viewed at BuildingWhat.org, will air 350+ times from November 2 through November 10 and is estimated to be seen by millions of viewers in the New York Metropolitan Area, reaching core target audiences multiple times. The ad will appear on thirteen channels including MSNBC, CNN, Comedy Central, HGTV, Logo TV, Bio TV, Versus TV, MSG, Sports NY, VH1, HLN, CNBC and Bravo.
NYC CAN’s goal is to generate public pressure on the New York City Council to open an investigation into the destruction of Building 7, which until 9-11 housed the City’s Emergency Operations Center, also known as “Mayor Giuliani’s bunker.”
“We’ve been educating the City Council about Building 7 and the need for a new investigation for the past six months,” said Bob McIlvaine, father of Bobby McIlvaine and one of the 9/11 family members who appear in the ad. “We are asking them now to do something about it.”
Patricia Perry, mother of NYPD officer John Perry, opens the ad saying, “Most people don’t know that a third tower fell on September 11th.” Footage of Building 7′s destruction begins to play while other 9/11 family members explain that 1,200 architects and engineers have examined the evidence and disagree with the official report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded that office fires brought down Building 7. This would mark the first and only time in history that fire has caused a steel-framed skyscraper to collapse. The ad closes by asking viewers to go to BuildingWhat.org to learn more.
The “BuildingWhat?” campaign is also being sponsored by the group of architects and engineers referred to in the ad. According to their website, www.AE911Truth.org, they now number 1,346 verified architectural and engineering professionals who have put their professional reputations on the line to publicly voice their disagreement with NIST’s findings.
“The most irrefutable evidence is the free fall descent of the building,” said Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical engineer in the aerospace industry. “You can’t go from zero movement to free fall acceleration instantaneously without an external force simultaneously removing all of the columns in the lower part of the building. If the upper structure has to do any work crushing what’s below it, it’s going to slow down.” According to Mr. Szamboti, NIST acknowledges in its report that the building underwent free fall, but it does not explain how.
