Todd talks 9/11 truth and information with 40 year veteran in the blasting and demolition field, Ron Watson. Ron goes through his in depth insight into the science and research behind 9/11 that is backed up by Richard Gage and the thousands of architects and engineers for 9/11 truth who have recently got a team of lawyers to take their case to a US grand jury. For all WAM updates and reports, visit our website, register for free and get our newsletter emailed to you weekly! http://winnipegalternativemedia.com
Constant in the 911False Flag Atrocity Studies, is the exposed Dichotomy between ‘Truth’ and ‘the LIE’ – the ‘Perception Management’ FireWall between Forensic Proofs and Context supplied by Experts in all Fields of DEMOLITION, Building Science, False Flag Methodology, And the total abject BLANK REFUSAL (Reactionary Denial) of the Academic community (en masse assumed responsible for genuine Intellectual Inquiry/disassembly) into those Forensic Proofs and Context.
By every Academic measure, this failure to research the Evidence of Demolition and Deception, trapping an entire generation of thinkers into an official narrative, can only argue to the Success of 911 FalseFlagDemolition; as ‘Deception.‘
A complex, multifaceted and Successful ‘Black’ Operation.
The Failure of Academia to understand the proofs of itself being deceived, can only illuminate the sophistication of Psychologies allowing for it. In this case, a Deception practiced upon a whole generation of IR Professionals now so thoroughly ‘believing,’ that they have fallen prey to the very confirmation-bias and rote response they accuse the 911 truth community (Ad Hominen ‘Conspiracy theorists) of exhibiting.
This Critical lack is exposed by Dr. David A. Hughes in this now (wonderfully) published and peer reviewed paper
9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline
[John PILGER: “In the 1970s, I met Leni Reifenstahl, close friend of Adolf Hitler, whose films helped cast the Nazi spell over Germany. She told me that the message in her films, the propaganda, was dependent not on “orders from above” but on what she called the “submissive void” of the public. ”Did this submissive void include the liberal, educated bourgeoisie?” I asked her. ”Of course,” she said, “especially the intelligentsia…. When people no longer ask serious questions, they are submissive and malleable. Anything can happen.”]
Its the patience of JOB, inside , that counts.
Given that uncle DONALD has served the poor beleaguered souls of Palestine a ‘peace plan,’ that can only lead to war ->>
maybe its time to do some reading …….
Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., here resumes her series of articles for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth that address a defining issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent — or Worse — About 9/11?” Each installment of this series has been a synthesis of academic research and clinical observations on the subject.
“Since the CIA has long played such a unique role in manipulating the media both in the U.S. and abroad, I will now, in this installment, give this muscular body composed of national security intelligence operatives the special attention it warrants. In so doing, I will demonstrate the clear overlap that exists between the CIA (part of the powerful) and the mainstream media’s executives and journalists (part of the structure).“
‘Few people know that the official account of the Twin Towers’ destruction relies entirely on just four journal papers. All four papers were coauthored by Northwestern University engineering professor Zdeněk Bažant, and all four were published in the ASCE’s Journal of Engineering Mechanics between 2002 and 2011 (Bažant submitted the first paper a mere two days after 9/11).
This past September, the most recent paper refuting Bažant’s theory was presented by German mathematician and physicist Ansgar Schneider at the annual congress of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE) in New York City. Schneider’s paper, “The Structural Dynamics of the World Trade Center Catastrophe,” can now be found in the conference proceedings and is also available for free on arXiv, the e-print server of the Cornell University Library.8
A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7
A research team at the University of Alaska’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, led by Dr. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor Feng Xiao, Department of Civil Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, released yesterday for public comment their findings from a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001. This is the first scientific investigation of the collapse of the building. Here is the conclusion:
“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
Sent through to RNZ (Saturday/JimMora/ThePanel/Sunday and WorldWatch) 5th Sept.
John Pilger wrote that: “In the 1970s, I met Leni Reifenstahl, close friend of Adolf Hitler, whose films helped cast the Nazi spell over Germany. She told me that the message in her films, the propaganda, was dependent not on “orders from above” but on what she called the “submissive void” of the public.
“Did this submissive void include the liberal, educated bourgeoisie?” I asked her.
“Of course,” she said, “especially the intelligentsia….When people no longer ask serious questions, they are submissive and malleable. Anything can happen.”
Our intellectual elites have failed us completely since the beginning of this terrible epoch. That so far no mention of this critically important study has been given any air at all, bodes ILL for its future discourse in the void. Our ‘journalists are afraid. We, the pathetic multitudes, are locked into ‘the orthodoxy’ in such powerful imprisonment of mind, that all objective and forensic truths in this very real matrix of falseflag, psyop, IIO, MKULTRA and black operational DRILLS-gone-live; Lie dying at the end of a no exit road.
This fascinating site presents the 4th generation probability ’cause and effect’ .
Think of Jim HOFFMAN’s 2003 equation; “The amount of energy required to expand the North Tower’s DUST cloud was many times the entire potential energy of the tower’s elevated mass due to gravity. The over ten fold disparity between the most conservative estimate and the gravitational energy is not easily dismissed as reflecting uncertainties in quantitative assessments. The official explanation that the twin towers collapses were gravity driven events appears insufficient to account for the documented energy flows.” More than 10 fold disparity . 11 acres of concrete flooring and steel infrastructure over 11 stories per second turned into hot rapidly expanding DUST; 5.87% of that, molten iron spheroids.. racing down the canyons and decay pathways of Manhattan, to the sea .
“Architects and engineers say planes don’t knock down skyscrapers. Nuclear physicists say only atomic bombs can turn out this kind of heat and damage. The real investigators who were silenced by a grand jury and a wealth of threats said it was a conspiracy and named lots of names, some expected, some not.
Now an independent physicist has proven the work done by the original investigators who were silenced and much new work as well. His modeling and detail is breathtaking.” see article https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/09/01/breathtaking-solving-nuclear-9-11-the-pommer-report/
From the ‘without jumping to conclusions dept.’ @ 58:04. in the Jason Goodman conversation [first link, below] ‘Luke Slytalker’ speaks of documentations found in SSI 2nd layer files between law firms listing NEIL ‘Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited’ company [among others AEGIS, LLOYDS etc] plaintiffs vs [among others] 7 World Trade Center company, Silverstein Properties.inc (@14 minute mark, 2nd link below)
Company Overview: “Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited provides insurance solutions to nuclear utilities. It insures electric utilities for damages to insured sites; decontamination expenses arising from nuclear contamination; risks of direct physical loss at sites; premature decommissioning costs; and the costs associated with long-term interruptions of electricity supply. Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited was incorporated in 1978 and is based in Wilmington, Delaware.” Incorporated in Bermuda.
Why NEIL at WTC7 as defendant? Was there a nuclear utility at ground zero?
Judge HELLERSTEIN appears @ 35:52 in Link 2 below. Adds to Christopher Bollyn’s assertion Hellerstein went for 100% settlement allowing NO discovery.
I thank these men and women for their work from the bottom of my heart.
I can remember walking the streets of Wellington in the days and months following the atrocity struggling to come to grips with the realization that those buildings exploded ! They did not ‘collapse’. ‘Collapse’ was sophistry! They Exploded! They exploded the world into a million pieces and a million dead.
Like a mirror, he said. You go through it. You get cut by the glass.
In the mirror of OBL, the hi-Jackers of our soul were the agnotological creatioNISTs of Shyam ‘Pinnochio’ Sunder’s National Institute of Standards and Technology. Part of the cut – the awareness – was, that until the ENGINEERS and Architects woke from dire slumber and contested the physicality of destruction; until then, any opposition to the OCT was futile. Because this is an engineering question. At the heart of it, the physics of destruction is an engineering question. Damage field. Forensic evidence. Metadata. Due Diligence.
Free Fall says it all.
After a year of rapid fire false flags, this comment by Michael wells, oped news, 2009 seems important/relevant.
| Michael Wells
Musings . . .:
Since I am the author of the above quoted question, it seems appropriate that I attempt to reply to your answer and your OpEdNews post here.
In answer to the above you wrote: “My answer is that I think the question of how the explosives got into the building can be protracted and distracted and confused long enough to keep the govt out of trouble. This is qualitatively different if we are talking about planes other than unmodified 757s and 767s on 9/11, for example. Can you imagine an article like Ryan’s pointing to dozens of possible suspects who might have “substituted” the planes (or faked the crashes)?”
Well, to be the Devils advocate for a moment, why not? If, as you point out in “9/11 Aletheia,” one can ascribe WTC demolition to a US “elite” (and thus, in some fashion, spare finger pointing at the US Government and military), why couldn’t the same be done regarding aircraft? For me there is no clear division between an “elite” and their control of our government, military and intelligence, counterintelligence and covert operations. What’s the difference that makes a difference here?
Taking that Devilish hat off, let me say that in the main I’m in complete agreement with you. This statement from “9/11 Aletheia” sealed it for me:
“It is evident, simply from the unanswered questions, that 9/11 was an inside job. It is equally evident that the government is not going to indict itself. It is also evident, to me at least, that they want us to know they did it (MITOP) [Made It Transparent On Purpose]. That is the only explanation for the obvious bungling of what could have been an undetectable false-flag operation. One can imagine a million ways a “terrorist” attack could have been feigned and blamed on a designated enemy, with no questions asked. I don’t believe in “stupidity theory.” Somebody made a conscious decision to do it this way, to “shock and awe” us into acceptance and resignation.”
As someone who knew that 9/11 was something other than what it was presented as being from the first moment I heard about it and as someone who was anticipating this kind of move by the “elite,” “secret government,” “new world order,” “MIC,” “national security state,” — whatever you want to call it — based on my life-long observation of domestic and foreign policy trends — I couldn’t agree with you more. It was treason and mass murder conducted openly and transparently in broad daylight for all who had eyes to see. A full-blown media “shock and awe” spectacle with the true targets being not the WTC or the Pentagon or some abandoned strip-mine in Pennsylvania, but the hearts and minds of the American people and, by extension, those of the wider world beyond. The intent was that of establishing an historical ‘public myth’ or ‘public presumption’ which could be used to radically alter domestic and foreign policy. Indeed, steel sky scrapers do not fall straight down at a rate of 10+ floors per second turning their contents into powder while ejecting naked, burning steel beams as they do so and leaving pools of molten metal in their wake — for any reason other than demolition. Errant aircraft do not plow into the Pentagon for any reason unless they are allowed to do so. Presidents, accompanied by a full Secret Service security detail, do not sit on camera in publicly disclosed locations in front of a second-grade classroom full of remedial readers for 20+ minutes while “America is under attack” by terrorists using hijacked airliners as WMD for any reason unless they are instructed to do so. The entire murderous and traitorous scenario was, and remains, preposterous on its face.
And yet it was done and gotten away with. From that date I began asking the question, “What is more terrifying to you, the prospect that America is vulnerable to attack by Islamic or other terrorists or the thought that something of this nature could be orchestrated and pulled off from within the national security aparatus itself?” For most this latter proposition is so terrifying it simply falls outside the realm of possibility and stretches credulity to the breaking point, regardless of what evidence to the contrary is put forward or by whom. To most it is unthinkable and precisely because it calls into question not only the 9/11 narrative but the entire social fabric of which our secondhand sense of identity is woven. Never mind that the social fabric is woven of ‘public myths’; never mind that our sense of self spun from it is equally ‘mythical’ (contrived, conditioned and programmed). Never mind that deception is not only the rule, it is how we are ruled. Never mind that this state of delusion is preferable to being an awake, aware, conscious individual, truly responsible for his decisions and actions in the world and their inevitable consequences.
In my opinion, the real “tar baby” is the suggestibility of the human mind and fearfulness of the human spirit. We have been conditioned to accept pronouncements from authority figures or, alternately, to rebel against them — all within mediated and pre-established limits. But what we’ve not been conditioned to do is the one thing we must do and that is to discover from within ourselves what the truth of our human predicament actually is. For that we cannot turn solely to “authorities” of any stripe but must repeatedly endeavour to uncover more basic and fundamental truths within the self.
It is this, our human predicament and conditioned suggestibility, that made 9/11 not only possible but inevitable. It is this which keeps even those who profess to be seeking the truth to find themselves at odds with those who they should recognize as compatriots in this struggle.
With 9/11 we have reached an historical event horizon over which the full-on nightmare of a global technological tyranny is rising like a blood-red moon and fully visible to any who dare to look. Few will for fear of being driven mad or, perhaps worse, being thought as such for having bothered. Far better to pretend it isn’t happening or, if it is, it is necessary, perhaps even preferable, and in any case inevitable. Who cares if future generations will live out their lives as oblivious to their true predicament as we have been to our own? What matters is that all of this ranting and raving remain the ineffectual discourse it has always been while those who have neither morality nor conscious continue their reign over the mostly willingly somnambulant masses.
We hear it said that the truth shall set us free — and indeed, it can. But truth is as rare as moments of bliss and neither can be granted by symbolic systems alone, no matter how well or ill conceived. Absent a corresponding awakening of intelligence, sensitivity and insight within the self, there can be no truth, no freedom, nor beauty, love or enlightenment of any kind. It is this, apparently, that men fear most however much they persuade themselves and one another to the contrary — when they even bother to think of it at all. And it is this realm of fear and self-deception that will be our ultimate undoing.
Submitted on Thursday, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:54:13 AM