In July 2010, Tony Farrell, the Principal Intelligence Analyst of South Yorkshire Police reviewed available evidence for his annual threat assessment against the people of South Yorkshire, England. He came to the conclusion that it was less likely that the events of 9/11 and 7/7 were al-Qaeda terrorist attacks than ‘false flag’ terrorist operations carried out by the intelligence services of western governments. As the alleged al-Qaeda attack in London was thought to have been planned in Yorkshire, and his annual threat assessment took into account the local threat from terrorism to the people of South Yorkshire, he reported his concerns to senior officers. He asked for time to produce a new assessment that included the threat from intelligence services as well as al-Qaeda.
His commitment to professional standards at South Yorkshire Police that he must ‘not knowingly make any false, misleading or inaccurate written statements’ was reinforced by a religious belief that he ‘must not bear false witness’. When senior police officers would not give him additional time to revise his threat assessment, he refused to sign off the annual threat assessment on the basis that it would be misleading.
Senior police officers suspended, and later dismissed, Tony Farrell from his job on the grounds of ‘incompatible beliefs’. At the internal appeal hearing by South Yorkshire Police, the chair stated: ‘Your views are very sincere and you may be right but it is, I’m afraid, incompatible at the moment with where we are’ (Mr Hiller, Director of Finance, South Yorkshire Police, 2nd September 2010). Later, at his appeal on 6th October 2010, and again at the Employment Tribunal in September 2011, Mr Littlejoy (chair of the appeal panel) claimed that Tony Farrell’s views were ‘conspiracy theories invented without any evidence’ and that they were ‘outlandish’.
More about Tony Farrell’s campaign here
Nobody can consider the events of the 7/7 Bombings without being aware of this video (below) . As “terror drills” helped and if the truth be known were part of the execution plans for the events of September the 11th. 2001 ,these “drills” were also part of the execution plans for the events of the 7/7 Bombings. In the video Peter Powers says that they were paid to run this drill …I ask why don’t we know who “they” ,that paid, were ?
Peter Power was live on BBC Radio as the bombing took place, speaking about the “drill” ! This is not a “conspiracy” ,this is a fact .Whoever paid for this “drill” is involved in the early deaths of the victims of that day and should be “hung by the neck until dead ” as the law demands. Treason has no peer.
On a different subject .I have been banned from posting on Facebook for three (3) days for violating some “hate speech” rule ?
I had posed the question on http://www.facebook.com/KeepOurAssets that went something like this ,”What do you call an elected official who refuses to follow the will of the people ” and I had put this image with the post http://www.google.co.nz/imgres?q=hitler+rally&hl=en&client=firefox-a&sa=X&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&biw=1152&bih=689&tbm=isch&prmd=imvns&tbnid=JpUJW-7INsj2zM:&imgrefurl=http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php%3Faz%3Dview_all%26address%3D389x4836797&docid=NocJDrEZeyj0uM&imgurl=http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/01_01/HitlerSurveysDM_468x326.jpg&w=468&h=326&ei=mMv0T7WTBKe6iQfO9qXeBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=512&vpy=321&dur=405&hovh=187&hovw=269&tx=103&ty=103&sig=116412443981804366035&page=1&tbnh=144&tbnw=185&start=0&ndsp=15&ved=1t:429,r:7,s:0,i:94
Now I have not engaged in hate speech ,have not even shown a face picture of Hitler but I an banned for 3 days with no opportunity to question their ruling !
Social Media is the “coined phrase” for Facebook and its like but if it acts like this and gives no path to pursue justice ,it is really Fascist Book.
The Peter Powers link as referred to above …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc
Thanks so much for the great links Mick. It is very difficult to watch the Peter Powers testimony and attribute to mere coincidence – I agree it is damming evidence 🙁 Bit like the FEMA people who were told to go to New York on the 10th September for an “exercise” before 9/11.
Just viewed another very good video by the 7/7 Truth Campaign – link below
At the time of the 7th anniversary of the bombings in London, this video reflects on the attacks, the outstanding questions, the efforts to get to the truth and the ongoing cover-up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VTGskq21tM
911,7/7, Madrid and Bali are all linked and not by a shadowy Muslims terrorist group !
Some alternate positions …
“A New Zealander working for Reuters in London says two colleagues witnessed the unconfirmed shooting by police of two apparent suicide bombers outside the HSBC tower at Canary Wharf in London. The New Zealander, who did not want to be named, said the killing of the two men wearing bombs happened at 10.30am on Thursday (London time).”
or …
“I was in Kings Cross right after the Piccadilly line blast and there was no problem calling into work to tell my boss that I would be late [a propos of whether mobile phones were working]. I then went into cafe to wait for the hubbub to die down. Over the radio we discovered that it was more than one bomb.
Just over an hour and a half later, there was a report on Radio 5 that some of the bombers were shot by armed response units in the Docklands. When I got home that evening, the news reports said that all the bombers died in the explosions.”
http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2010/10/22/new-support-for-canary-wharf-story/
I would suggest that the “alleged suicide bombers” where actually paid personnel of Visor Corp ,working for Peter Power . Their part of the “drill” was to be the “perpetrators” but as the train records show ,they arrived late due to a line outage. They therefore were not on the trains that they where meant to be on and once they heard that actually bombs where going off they realised they where being set up ! They then got in touch by cell phone and arrange to meet at Canary Wharf ,which would be easy for all four to reach. Their phones where being monitored and once they met they were killed and quickly removed. You may remember the electrician ,Mendez I think his name was ,he worked in the underground in the area of one of the bombs and you could easily wonder if he saw something that would blow the lid on the real events . People being lead out of the bombed carriages reported the damage appeared to be from an explosion UNDER the floor of the train. With the jagged edges of metal coming UP INTO THE CARRIAGE not down us you would see if the “bomb” was on the floor in the carriage.
Then there is the bus …the weekend before the bombings the actual bus in question was receiving special attention at the depot. All London buses have CCTV cameras and recording devices on board and they get “serviced” every weekend by a crew of technicians .the bus that exploded was “serviced” the weekend prior to the bombing by a “crew” of unknown “technicians” and they ONLY serviced that bus after they moved it to an area within the depot and allowed no one to approach it. Then it turns out that NO CCTV footage was recovered from that and only that bus in the ensuing investigation . The “faulty” CCTV cameras is always a common factor in these “operations” . The Tube had no cameras showing the “alleged Bombers” actually on the trains in question and only a few “stills” have been released.
Curiouser and curiouser …
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8756795263359807776