ReThink911 Keeps Building 7 in the Headlines
Let the BBC Editor Know the Public Doesn’t Buy Their One-Sided Coverage
Plus: NY Times Billboard Continues through December!
Yesterday the BBC published an article about the ongoing ReThink911 ad campaign in Ottawa. Featured on the BBC’s News homepage still today, the article has been seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.
This piece marks the fifth mainstream news article about ReThink911’s Ottawa campaign since the announcement of the campaign on November 20. But unlike its Canadian counterparts, the BBC has a tendency for falseness and one-sidedness rivaled only by the likes of Fox News.
Tell the BBC Editor Their Reporting Is a Journalistic Disgrace
Please take 2 minutes right now to let the Editor of the BBC’s North America edition know how you feel about their reporting. Just copy-paste the letter below, or write your own. Please be sure to Bcc us at AE911Truth so that we can keep a count of how many emails are sent.
To: [email protected]
Bcc: [email protected]
Dear Ms. Milne,
The BBC’s article on the ReThink911 ad campaign in Ottawa is a journalistic disgrace. The number of false claims and one-sided maneuvers is simply astounding.
Most disturbing is how the article falsely labeled Jonathan Kay and Popular Mechanics “experts,” while neglecting to quote a single one of the 2,100 engineering and architecture experts who are so critical of the official account that they are demanding a new World Trade Center investigation. In addition, the article provides links to every source it references that supports the official account of 9/11, but not a single link to a source critiquing the official account.
With regard to the poll commissioned by ReThink911 and conducted by the polling firm YouGov, the article falsely, groundlessly calls it “unscientific,” and then conveniently neglects to embed or link to the 30-second video shown to the poll respondents. It seems rather obvious the video would be of interest to your readers.
The article disrespectfully caricatures 9/11 activists by likening the group in Hamilton, Ontario to terrorists belonging to a “cell,” and the article does not mention even once the name of the ad campaign – or its website ReThink911.org.
If your goal was to mislead the public about the very serious pursuit of truth regarding the events of 9/11, congratulations, I would say you succeeded admirably – except I think most people can see through this atrocious, unabashedly one-sided “reporting.”
If you care at all about preserving the BBC’s journalistic integrity, I would suggest you make up for this horrible disservice to the public with an article that gives equal and unbiased attention to the more than 2,100 architects and engineers calling for a new investigation into the destruction of Building 7.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
NY Times Billboard to Continue through December
Finally, we are thrilled to inform you that we have extended our NY Times billboard through the end of December for an absolutely rock bottom price. Our audacious billboard continues to greet reporters and editors on the way to work everyday. Soon we will be announcing new actions to hold the NY Times accountable for its lack of coverage of Building 7. Stay tuned!
Thank you as always for your tremendous support!
Support ReThink911 with a donation today
Dear Ms Milne
I have just read the article covering the ReThink911 ad campaign in Ottawa on your website and I am shocked at the lack of journalistic integrity inherent in the coverage of this issue. Given the enormity of the 9/11 attacks and the drastic changes to foreign and domestic policies that have been justified as responses to those attacks, the events of 9/11 deserve an honest, independent investigation.
Most concerning is how this article falsely claims Jonathan Kay and Popular Mechanics as “experts,” while neglecting to quote a single one of the 2,100 engineering and architecture experts who are so critical of the official account that they are demanding a new World Trade Center investigation. In addition, the article provides links to every source it references that supports the official account of 9/11, but not a single link to a source critiquing the official account.
With regard to the poll commissioned by ReThink911 and conducted by the polling firm YouGov, the article also falsely and groundlessly calls it “unscientific,” and then conveniently neglects to embed or link to the 30-second video shown to the poll respondents. It seems rather obvious the video would be of interest to your readers. The article also disrespectfully caricatures 9/11 activists by likening the group in Hamilton, Ontario to terrorists belonging to a “cell,” and the article does not mention even once the name of the ad campaign – or its website ReThink911.org.
May I also point out to you that increasingly, this issue is being viewed as a scientific controversy worthy of global media debate. The publicly owned broadcasting stations of Canada, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Russia and here in New Zealand have all broadcast programmes exposing the fraudulence of the official version of 9/11. A live in-person interview on New Zealand’s National radio in November 2009 with the founder of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, Richard Gage, AIA, generated huge public interest. Later that same day, an overflow crowd of over 630 people were present at the National Museum to hear him speak, with over 100 people turned away due to lack of room. At the end of the presentation a straw poll found that there were only half a dozen attendees who remained unconcerned about the accuracy of the official reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the 9/11 Commission. The producer of the Radio New Zealand radio programme reported that the programme had received over 350 supportive e-mails from listeners. A subsequent interview with Mr Gage on New Zealand’s most popular current affairs programme, at that time, TVNZ’s Close Up, also garnered wide public support. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2INIOXe_WI
Please rectify the public’s trust in the BBC by providing an article that reflects the scientific facts as they stand today represented by the 2,100 architects and engineers calling for a new investigation into the destruction of Building 7. This issue is critically important to both the citizens of Great Britain and their commonwealth allies who have been taken into these wars on the basis of the official story of 9/11 that is being reinforced by the BBC.
I hope in the very near future the BBC chooses to be on the side of the truth and pays attention to the 2,100 technical and building professionals who have signed their names in support of the request for a new and truly independent investigation of the events of 911 (which includes the mysterious collapse of WTC 7).
Yours sincerely